F. Izzo1, F. Sabatano2, P. Aiello2
Given the increasing complexity of the world, school-to-work guidance pathways may serve as an educational and inclusive tool that aim to operate from a lifelong and lifewide perspective. These programs are essential in supporting the transition of students with disabilities into adulthood, and for “facilitating decision-making mechanisms, enabling adaptation to the environment, anticipating and positively addressing transition and change, and understanding and managing the complexity of social and cultural dynamics” (author's translation).
This transition phase—where students move from school to the workforce—is particularly challenging for young people with disabilities. It often represents a critical and delicate period, frequently marked by confusion and uncertainty. School-to-work guidance pathways may offer these students valuable experiences that could help them envision their future and develop more effective paths for growth and employment.
This paper draws on the theory of simplexity, originally developed in neurophysiology and later applied to education. Simplexity refers to a unique characteristic of living organisms that allow them—through intrinsic properties and guiding principles—to develop nonlinear strategies for understanding, managing, and addressing life's complexities. Specifically, the principle of probabilistic anticipation enables individuals to draw upon past experiences and future expectations to find smarter, faster, and more effective solutions.
This study aims to analyze school-to-work guidance pathways through the lens of simplexity, helping students with disabilities "adapt to unpredictable internal and external challenges"(author's translation) while building skills that "bridge the ever-present gap between theory and practice."(author's translation).
References:
[1] Aiello, P., Sabatano, F., & Capodanno, F. (2023). Scelgo, dunque sono. Orientamento, scelta e agentività. Nuova Secondaria, 40(6), Febbraio 2023.
[2] Berthoz, A. (2011). La semplessità. Torino: Codice.
[3] Frauenfelder, E. (1986). L’improponibile frontiera tra “eredità” ed “ambiente” in educazione. In M. Sibilio (a cura di), La didattica semplessa (pp. [inserire pagine]). Napoli: Liguori Editore.
[4] Malaguti, E. (2019). Agenda 2030, inclusione sociale e lavorativa anche per le persone con disabilità intellettiva: approccio ecologico sociale e umano. Formare, 19(2), 321–332.
[5] Morin, E. (2011). La sfida della complessità. La défi de la complexité. Grassina: Le Lettere.
[6] Mura, A. (a cura di). (2018). Orientamento formativo e Progetto di Vita. Narrazione e itinerari didattico-educativi. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
[7] Sibilio, M. (2013). La didattica semplessa. Napoli: Liguori Editore.
[8] Sibilio, M. (2015). La funzione orientativa della didattica semplessa. Pedagogia Oggi, 1, 327–334.
[9] Sibilio, M. (2023). La semplessità. Proprietà e principi per agire il cambiamento. Brescia: Scholé.
[10] Wehmeyer M.L. , Self-determination as an educational outcome. Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities, Paul H Brookes Pub Co, 1996.
Keywords: School- to- work guidance, disability, simplexity.